Something different?

“The secret of change is to focus all of your energy, not on fighting the old, but on building the new.” — Socrates

Font Size

SCREEN

Profile

Layout

Menu Style

Cpanel
You are here You are here: Home Study Money & Banking Making the Truth Illegal
  Making the Truth Illegal – revisited       by: Golem XIV

“Making the Truth Illegal” is the title of the only post I have ever removed from this blog.
 I removed it because I was threatened with legal consequences if I did not.

 (Plus, I would like to add, some of the way I had written the blog post was stupid and could have hurt someone who had helped me.)


An interview about Money Laundering

The post concerned an article I had written for a division of Thomson Reuters which they decided they could not/would not publish. The division of Thomson Reuters pulled the article because they and I had been threatened, by a major European Bank, with legal consequences if they did not.

The title of the article was “Cyprus, Magnitsky and the truth about Money Laundering.”

Although I cannot publish the article I can show you how it began and tell you how it is, that the truth it contained was made illegal.

The article began:

  • quote small leftMoney laundering is the life blood of organized crime. Without it crime would simply not pay. But who does the laundering? The easy and obvious answer is criminals. But that is completely wrong and is at the root of our inability to stop it.
  •    Criminals are the people who need money laundering. They are the clients. But they do not, themselves, know how to launder money. The only people who do know, and who are in positions to do it, are those whose day jobs are the many professional services which make up laundering: the accountants, lawyers, company registration and management agents, account managers in banks and company directors in companies that have no reason to be, other than to pass hot money through an endless spin cycle. In organized crime, criminals provide the crime but professionals provide the organization.
  •    Of course we could get jesuitical about it and say, but those professionals who launder are criminals. Which would be fine, except that we do not treat them as criminals. Criminals break laws. Professionals do not, they have ‘failures of compliance’. One is considered an active, purposeful ‘doing’ of something, for which punishment is de rigeur. The other is excused as an unfortunate and unintentional ‘not doing’; an oversight, omisssion or failure to do, for which one and one’s employer get admonished to ‘do’ better. And as long as you promise you will, all is considered fine and finished. There may be a small fine but nothing to lose your bonus over. No one senior ever goes to gaol.
  •    Criminals are investigated – by police. Professionals are ‘regulated’ – usually, and rather conveniently, by themselves or colleagues. People who rob banks have legal problems. People in banks, who rob people, or help others to rob them by laundering their money for them, they have regulatory issues. One is serious the other is a joke. How many bankers actually went to prison from Wachovia or Citi or HSBC?
  •    All this might seem rather sweeping. But it is not. It is just that usually we do not get to hear about the people and businesses who do the actual laundering nor what happens to them afterwards. When money laundering is reported it is usually the lurid details of the clients of the money laundering, the drug cartels and terrorist organization, who get all the headlines. Hardly ever do we hear of the launderers themselves. And that is because, as already noted, they are never ‘guilty’ of having ‘done’ anything. But events in Cyprus have recently given us a rare opportunity to lift the sewer’s cover, peer inside and see at least some of the people who failed to act; who by omission, oversight, laziness or complicity, intentionally or otherwise, ‘helped’ to launder money.
  •    As the philosopher Edmund Burke famously noted,“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing”.quote small right
Criminals buy banks

As you can see the purpose of the article was not simply to prove, what everyone already knew, that Cyprus had indeed been laundering dirty Russian money, but to say something about WHO actually does the laundering. The point was to finger the launderers themselves not their clients.  Of course that meant naming companies, lawyers, company directors, company registration agents, and last but not least, the banks and individuals in them. These are, of course, people who are not used to the idea that they can be named, take grave exception to being named and who have the power, I discovered, to make sure they are not.

The article also did one further thing. When you added it all together and told the whole tale in all its detail, with all the names, dates, places and amounts, one further conclusion jumped out.  The lawyers, accountants, company directors and bankers, who did the laundering, are also the people who the anti money-laundering system relies upon to police the system and stop the laundering. The inescapable conclusion is that the anti-money laundering system not only does not work, but seems expressly fashioned to make sure it does not work.

It is possible – it happened in the Magnitsky case – for a criminal to buy a bank and be granted a bank license. Yet the law says it is the directors of such a bank who will be relied upon to contact the authorities about suspicious transactions. Criminals don’t often turn themselves in, yet in every country this is the non-system our leaders and financial experts maintain. In the UK the law is set up so that a company can be set up without any due diligence at all being done to determine the character let alone the actual identity of the owner. Because of this ‘loophole’ as the authorities coyly refer to it,  the UK is home to tens of thousands of shell companies set up by criminals and used for criminal purposes. This may sound like a fantastic charge and one I cannot possibly substantiate. Yet almost every major case of fraud or money laundering will involve UK shell companies. Follow the Magnitsky money and you will see it pass thorough UK shell companies. The same goes for the $64 billion of state money stolen from Kyrgyzstan much of it then passed through UK shell companies. Or the  on-going case of money laundered out of Ukraine by means of a fake oil rig purchase. That money too passed through UK companies.

The last shell

I could give you plenty of other examples but the important point is that NO ONE in authority can offer a shred of evidence to show that I am wrong no matter how many criminal companies I claim there are likely to be, for one simple reason. THEY HAVE NO IDEA WHO OWNS THE COMPANIES. The system is set up so no one knows. Companies register owners but they can be other companies in other jurisdictions. And it is easy to set up a company in such a way so that no one checks on the owner at all, ever. That is the system we maintain.

Every minister who has ever had the power to change this state of affairs has been aware of this but they have all chosen to leave it that way.

In short we have a system which is conveniently designed so it does not stop money laundering but does make sure no one will be prosecuted. It serves to shield the guilty not stop them.

I realize these are statements that can still be dismissed as ‘conspiracy’. Without the 8000 words of detail the article contained, without the references to over a hundred pages of bank transfers and company records, I am left with just what I know to be the case without being able to show you what convinced me.

All I can do, as promised, is show you the final ‘shell’ which surrounds everything else and which allows the rest of the corrupt system to exist and do its job. The last shell is a legal one and I had not understood its importance, nor its power, until it did its job and stopped me publishing.

This is how it works

First a few facts. In the Magnitsky case  $230 million was stolen from the Russian state. That money was then laundered  in a scheme that involved five deaths, a lorry load of bank records that exploded, eight banks, numerous shell companies and complete, abject and total regulatory failure. It is called the Magnitsky case after Sergei Magnitsky who was found dead, handcuffed on the floor of a cell in a Russian prison. His body, photographed at the time, was covered in bruises.

Mr Magnitsky had been arrested and then held without charge or trial in the custody of the Russian Interior Ministry for nearly a year. He had been detained shortly after he had named in official testimony Interior Ministry officials and certain tax officials as the criminals behind the theft. The men he named were the ones who arranged his detention.

BUT, the Interior Ministry held its own investigation. What it found was that although the money had indeed ‘gone missing’, none of the officials Mr Magnitsky had named were, according to their official investigation, guilty of anything other than being ‘tricked’ by person or persons unknown. The Ministry did try to suggest several culprits but two of them died mysteriously of heart attacks a thousand kilometres from their homes before they could testify, while another had, rather embarrassingly, died before the crime he was accused of  had even been committed. The Ministry looked silly even by Russian standards and no case was brought.

Eventually the Russian officials accused the deceased Mr Magnitsky of being the mastermind behind the crime he had been investigating. At one point the Russian state said it was going to put him on trial posthumously. So far it has not. And thus the case rests with the conclusion that there was no crime, only a ‘trick’ with no one found guilty.

Case closed

It was also decided in Mr Magnitsky’s absence that despite the photographic evidence of his beaten body, he had died of natural causes and no crime had been committed there either. Case closed. And that ‘Case closed’ is what it is all about.

In the end it doesn’t matter what actually happened nor what evidence is to hand. As long as some official body does its own ‘investigation’ from which it concludes nothing happened, then nothing did, and the  case can be closed. Not only that but if anyone should try to look for themselves at the evidence they cannot refer to anyone or any bank as being involved in criminal behaviour of any kind. Because there wasn’t any.

If no money was stolen – and none was because the Russian said so – then no one could have laundered any. How can you launder money that was not stolen?

The Russian decision meant, in legal parlance, that there was no ‘predicate’ crime – no crime from which other crimes followed. Which means, if one authority says there was no crime, every other authority in every other country, should it want to, can point to this judgment and say, ‘why should we investigate anything if there was no crime in the first place?’

This meant when an official complaint was sent to the Cypriot authorities in 2008 alerting them to the Magnitsky affair, right at its beginning, they could ignore it. And they did. The Cypriot police were sent an official complaint in 2008, and to this day they have never replied to it nor even questioned the people, even Cypriot people, named in it.

No predicate crime

In fact even when the Cypriot Authorities were sent another much more detailed complaint in 2012, which gave them dozens of leads and lines of enquiry they wrote back saying,

  • quote small left…it is important that we firstly obtain information from the Russian authorities about the predicate offence or offences committed in Russia.
  •    Thus we plan to contact the Russian authorities in order to obtain information…quote small right

And of course there was no predicate crime. Not officially. Even though companies were stolen and hundreds of millions did ‘go missing’.

Similarly, in 2010 another complaint was sent about the Magnitsky affair, this time to the Austrian authorities. The complaint alleged that the very large and powerful Austrian bank Raiffeisen, had handled much of the  money that had ‘gone missing’. The Austrian authorities opened an investigation which concluded Raiffeisen had done nothing wrong at all. Case closed.

The Russians found no crime had been committed on their patch. The Austrians found nothing on their patch either.

This is despite the fact that Raiffeisen did handle the money. But you see handling is NOT laundering. Laundering requires the money be illicit AND that Raiffeisen knew, or reasonably could have known, the money was illicit. And the Austrian regulator concluded that Raiffeisen could not have known there was anything wrong with either the money it was handling, nor the bank from which it came nor the owner of that bank. The owner we are talking about here  is the criminal – a convicted criminal who owned his own bank – mentioned earlier.  According to Raiffeisen and the Austrian regulator the criminal past of the owner of the bank Raiffeisen was doing business with, could not have been known till a later date.

And that is how you make the truth illegal

Now I find this judgement to be difficult to understand since the man in question had been convicted in Russian court in 2006. There are court transcripts of his admission of guilt which I have read. Yet Raiffeisen was handling the money in question in 2008.

BUT it doesn’t matter if I or you find this odd. The only FACT that is important, is that the Austrian regulator looked and found Raiffeisen NOT guilty of any crime. And so they are innocent. Case closed.

This is how you can end up, as I did, compiling facts and dates, evidence of bank transfers subpoenaed in court, which lead you to a conclusion that you are nevertheless not allowed to make public. You can present all the evidence but you  must contrive to do it without ever mentioning the name of a crime, nor suggesting any illegal activity in the piece. And of course you certainly cannot conclude in writing what the evidence suggests. If you try to , as I found, you are threatened with the law.

And that is how you make the truth illegal.

If this was just one case it would be horrible but isolated. But it is not. This use of official and legal judgements to squash the truth is exactly what happened in the case of Jonathan Sugarman and UniCredit. He found evidence that UniCredit was very seriously breaking the law. He got an outside company to check and they agreed. The Irish regultor however,  said, ‘There’s nothing to see here move along’. And Jonathan was threatened with leagal action if he did not go quietly away and hide.

What does all this mean for money laundering?

Here is how I concluded the article I cannot publish.

  • quote small leftPeople love to talk about the ‘risks to banks and companies’ from money laundering. What risks? Think of the notorious cases of money laundering before Magnitsky: Citi., Wachovia, HSBC. No one was gaoled. No one senior even lost their job. Fines are a joke. Wachovia, for example handled or laundered over $370 billion of dirty or suspect money out of Mexico. They were fined one two thousandth of that amount, just $160 million. As a percentage of the direct financial benefits accrued to Wachovia, from having the dirty money flowing through their books, fines for money laundering are vanishingly small and better thought of as a tip pressed into the palm of a compliant doorman.
  •    In reality, simply looking at the facts of what it has cost the banks in gaol time, fines or even something as intangible as their standing with their regulators and governments, it is very much worth it to launder. As for ‘standing’ or reputation – being guilty of huge money laundering did no harm to Citi when it came to bailing them out. Nothing untoward has happened to Wachovia or HSBC. In short – on a cost benefit analysis I would say it is of huge benefit and virtually no risk, for any bank large enough to be able to launder money, to do so.
  •    And what of all the many companies and professionals, the company agents, lawyers and accountants, who do the jobs which make up the bulk of the work of laundering? Are there any real risks for them? I would say there are few because our system simply does not investigate what they choose to do. Instead it is very careful to only ask them to fill out forms, to self regulate and to ‘comply’.
  •    I think the questions we need to ask ourselves and our politicians is why is it that the financial world is ‘regulated ‘ while we, ordinary citizens, are policed? Why do they have regulations to observe, while we have laws to obey? Why are they asked to merely assess themselves while we are investigated by officers of the law? Who profits from this careful double standard?
  •    When you boil it all down, anti-money laundering is about asking criminals and the law abiding, both, to write reports about themselves. Needless to say the criminals lie. But we pretend not to notice, and so in every country all the paperwork says there is no money laundering going on. Yet hundreds of billions is laundered every year.quote small right

Money & Banking

Prev Next Page:

Donald Trump and the Coming Fall of Amer…

Donald Trump and the Coming Fall of American Empire

Donald Trump and the Coming Fall of American Empire      LINK A new book by the famed historian Alfred McCoy predicts that China is set to surpass the influence of the U.S. globally, both militarily and economically, by the year 2030. At that point, McCoy asserts the United States Empire as we know it will be no more. He sees the Trump presidency as one of the clearest byproducts of the erosion of U.S. global dominance, but not its root cause. At the same time, he also believes Trump may accelerate the empire’s decline. McCoy argues that the 2003 invasion of Iraq was the beginning...

Read more

The Dubious Friends of Donald Trump

 The Dubious Friends of Donald Trump    from: Zembla The dubious friends of Donald Trump: Part 1 (click READ MORE to view Part 2)  “Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.” This statement by Donald Trump is one of the most memorable of the 2016 presidential election campaign. Most voters saw it simply as the Republican nominee needling Hillary Clinton, his Democratic opponent, after WikiLeaks began posting hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee. Malcolm Nance, an author, security consultant and former U.S. Navy intelligence officer, has a different view of it. “When Trump made that statement on July 27,” Nance says, “he knew Russian intelligence was...

Read more

The Judeo-Russian Mafia

The Judeo-Russian Mafia

  The Judeo-Russian Mafia       From: Veterans Today While the FBI and major media obsess about the Sicilian Mafia (the “Cosa Nostra”) a far more powerful and sinister force is in existence that has controlled most of the globe’s organized crime for at least two decades—the Jewish mafia from Russia (a “Kosher Nostra”). Yet there is not even a desk at the FBI for their crimes, which dwarf those of the Italian gangsters in scope, violence and depth… The Judeo-Russian Zionist mafia AKA the Kosher Nostra has come a long way in the last century. They came to America from the Russian Empire largely penniless and through...

Read more

The Illogic of Atheism

The Illogic of Atheism

  The Illogic of Atheism       by: Miles Mathis Most people arriving here will assume I am a Christian or at least a theist. I am not. I am also not an agnostic. To be an agnostic is to be a doubter. But to doubt you must have a certain amount of information. A computer with insufficient data is not agnostic, for instance. A computer does not doubt, it reserves judgment. It refuses to give a conclusion when a conclusion is not in the numbers. Now, humans are not computers. I am not a materialist and not reductive, so I would never make that argument. I am only making a loose analogy...

Read more

The Case for Reality

The Case for Reality

The Case for Reality and against the mainstream media   by: Miles Mathis That's Donald Hoffman, a professor of cognitive science at University of California, Irvine, we are told. He is featured this week in an article at The Atlantic. The title is, “The Case against Reality”. Hoffman and the editors at The Atlantic want to convince you the reality you believe in doesn't really exist. OK. So I guess that means Hoffman may or may not be a professor of cognitive science. He may just be a CIA agent posing as a professor of cognitive science, a sim, or some photo they pulled out of the...

Read more

Making the Truth Illegal

  Making the Truth Illegal – revisited       by: Golem XIV “Making the Truth Illegal” is the title of the only post I have ever removed from this blog.I removed it because I was threatened with legal consequences if I did not. The post concerned an article I had written for a division of Thomson Reuters which they decided they could not/would not publish. The division of Thomson Reuters pulled the article because they and I had been threatened, by a major European Bank, with legal consequences if they did not. The title of the article was “Cyprus, Magnitsky and the truth about Money Laundering.” Although I cannot...

Read more

The Silver Ruble Coin for Russia

The Silver Ruble Coin for Russia

  The Silver Ruble Coin for Russia       by: Hugo Salinas Price A presentation by Hugo Salinas-Price, President of the Mexican Civic Association, A.C., offered to the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, June 16-18, 2016, at the generous invitation of Mr. Sergei Prikhodko, Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation. I. Russia: Leadership Through Better Ideas II. The Silver Ruble Coin Revolution Strengthens Russia III. The Silver Ruble Coin: True Wealth for Russians IV. Economic Effects of the Russian Silver Ruble Coin V. The Russian Silver Ruble Coin vis a vis the US Dollar VI. Silver Ruble Coin and the Money Supply VII. Central Bankers and Silver Money VIII. The Failure of Mechanistic Economics IX. Mexican Civic...

Read more

The Network

The Network

  The Network       by: Anthony Forwood NOTE: This is a SPECULATIVE look at the possible structure and organization of the secret network that I believe lies behind organized gang-stalking and mind control. What I describe here is based on my own research, observations, and personal experiences. How I depict the gang-stalking network within this document may not precisely reflect the way it’s actually structured or how it operates, but it seems to be close to how things really are. Whatever the case, the structure and operational methods described here are completely workable in all respects and the security measures used would be quite effective in keeping the network...

Read more

Price of Gold

Price of Gold

Click for updates    Check this option to view updates,As of 02/15/2015:     ■ Brief introduction.     ■ World gold production by country.     ■ Zero Hedge article on Russian gold purchases with selected comments. [LINK]     ■ How Much Gold Stock is There Really? [LINK]     ■ Above-ground Gold Stock - How Much Is There and Why Does it Matter? [LINK]     Price of Gold       by: Tony Lutz Click to view larger image What is the price of gold? Depends upon:   ■ How much you want to buy.   ■ How soon to take physical possession.   ■ Circumstances of purchase.   ■ Geopolitical events.

Read more

Evil with a Nice Face

Evil with a Nice Face

  Evil with a Nice Face – The Janus Principle      @ Veterans Today Click to view larger image The Roman God Janus symbolizes the ancient Babylonian knowledge of using two faces to keep the public fooled or confused.      This involves projecting a benevolent but false “public servant” face which is completely disconnected from an evil demonic monster self within which deploys grotesque evil in secret to serve the establishment’s Secret Evil Agenda of a NWO takeover.      Masters of the Janus Principle know that any disclosure of their Secret Evil Practices which can include rampant and extreme secret perversities, S&M, pedophilia and even child sacrifice, if understood...

Read more

Beyond capitalism

Beyond capitalism

  Beyond Capitalism       From: Le Contrarien   Click for editor's note   The original article can be found at Le Contrarien.com which is in French.This is a Google translation of that page.Also see this article reposted at 2012: What's the 'real' truth?,including many comments (in English). The article is an imaginary final Bilderberg speech. Classified top secret report of the last Bilderberg meeting Click to view larger image Bilderberg Hotel in the Netherlands,name-giving locationof the first conference in 1954 My dear contarians, my dear contrarians! This is a special edition, very special that I propose today. I would like you to understand the real ways of the world, the world in which we live...

Read more

The 9/11 Triple Cross

The 9/11 Triple Cross

  The 9/11 Triple Cross       From: Veterans News Now The “reversible false flag” scheme and the “hijacked plot” hypothesis A new paradigm in 9/11ology by Laurent Guyénot Three major thesis are in competition concerning the culprit of the 9/11 attacks: Islam Job: the official conclusion of the 9/11 Commission, blaming Muslim terrorists in general, and Osama bin Laden in particular; Inside Job: the dominant thesis within the so-called 9/11 Truth movement, which accuses the American government, or a faction within the American Deep State; Mossad Job: the rising alternative thesis within the community of truth seekers, which claim that the masterminds were a Zionist network close to the Israeli...

Read more

Welcome to the New Dark Age

Welcome to the New Dark Age

  Welcome to the New Dark Age       By: Hugo Salinas Price The Powers That Be in the US and its allies seem to be committed to keeping the price of gold below $1320US/oz. Is the US control of the price of gold bad for China? It would appear that since China is purchasing large amounts of gold, keeping the price from rising is in the interest of the Chinese. Is the US control of the price of gold bad for Russia? It would appear that Russia has no urgent reason to see a higher price of gold. Is control of the price of gold considered as...

Read more

All Wars Are Bankers' Wars!

All Wars Are Bankers' Wars!

From: What Really Happened? By Michael Rivero Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of a pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this world would be a happier and better world to live in. But if you wish to remain slaves of the Bankers and pay...

Read more

The 161 Bankers Who Run the World

The 161 Bankers Who Run the World

  The 161 Bankers Who Run the World       From: Veterans Today Click to view larger image Click image to view at 1000 × 680 Image Source How They Do ItBy Dr. Stuart Jeanne Bramhall In following video, Peter Phillips from Project Censored lays out exactly how the richest one-thousandth of 1% maintain iron control over the global economy and all so-called democratic governments. He cites a study Project Censored published in their Top 25 Censored Stories of 2012-2013 edition of the world’s most “integrated”* corporations and those with the largest financial asset concentration. Unsurprisingly, there’s considerable overlap between the two groups.

Read more

2013: ‘The End Game’- Is the Big Reset I…

2013: ‘The End Game’- Is the Big Reset Imminent?

We are here . . . the eye of the storm From: Global Macro Investor The Global Macro Investor is an elite subscription-based research service written and published by Raoul Pal.  Clients include the world’s largest hedge funds, sovereign wealth funds, state pension funds and family offices globally.  Raoul has over 22 years experience in the global macro space including running a large global macromacro fund. The returns generated by GMI’’s model portfolio sinces model portfolio since its launch in 2005 are the best in the industry (fingers crossed that it continues!).

Read more

Gold, Freedom and the Search for Truth

Gold, Freedom and the Search for Truth

  Gold, Freedom and the Search for Truth       From: Lips Institute Click to view larger image Ferdinand Lips This page is a tribute to an exceptional person and outstanding personality: Ferdinand Lips spent decades pondering classical Liberalism and, together with this, the history of money. Why? Because he believed money (i.e. gold) and human freedom were inextricably linked to each other. In an age in which the nations of this world gain more power each day and the schools teach only the lessons that serve the respective government and its ruling class, and in which the media has largely sold its independence and no longer sees...

Read more